AI Writing Style Analyzer

Because that number is misleading. Independent research and even universities (several have dropped Turnitin's AI score and similar tools) have found these detectors produce meaningful false positives, especially against non-native English writers and heavily-edited text. A confident-looking percentage hides that uncertainty — we'd rather show you the actual signals than a fake-precise number.

Human writing naturally mixes short punchy sentences with long complex ones — high burstiness. Unedited AI text often has more uniform sentence lengths — low burstiness. It's a real, measurable pattern, but heavily-edited AI text or a very consistent human writer can both land anywhere on this scale — it's a clue, not proof.

AI text sometimes leans on the same connecting phrases repeatedly ("Moreover," "In conclusion," "It is important to note that"). Finding several isn't proof of AI — some human writers do this too, especially in formal or academic writing — but a heavy concentration is worth a second look.

No. Please don't use signal-based tools like this (or any AI detector) as the sole basis for academic or professional accusations — the false-positive risk is real and well documented. Use it for your own writing, to understand your own patterns, or as one small data point among many.